Why Smart Brands Are Ditching Agencies for Ecommerce Accelerators in 2025
- Fifth Shelf
- Apr 17
- 1 min read
In 2025, ecommerce agencies are collapsing under the weight of their own inefficiencies. Retainers. Delays. Generic strategies. Brands that actually want to grow are opting for ecommerce accelerators—partners who buy product, fund ads, and work with skin in the game.

The Agency Problem (2020–2024)
Agencies promised scale—but delivered delays, templates, and invoices. Brands paid monthly retainers for "optimization" and "strategy"... only to watch sales stall and excuses pile up.
Common agency failings:
Cookie-cutter playbooks with no brand context
High fees with zero accountability
No skin in the game — they get paid whether you grow or not
What Changed in 2025
Brand operators are savvier. They want:
Partners, not middlemen
Real outcomes, not retainers
Teams that move fast and fund growth
That’s why accelerators are rising. They:
Buy your inventory (DWP model)
Fund ads with performance incentives
Optimize listings, run creative, manage ops—all tied to results
Ecommerce Accelerators vs Agencies: Key Differences
Feature | Traditional Agency | Ecommerce Accelerator (Fifth Shelf) |
Retainers | High, recurring | None (DWP) |
Inventory involvement | None | Direct purchase + fulfillment |
Incentive alignment | No | Yes — we only grow if you grow |
Time to launch | Weeks/months | Days/weeks |
Marketplace expertise | Varies | Amazon, Walmart, DTC focused |
Ad execution | Often outsourced | In-house, data-driven |
What Smart Brands Are Doing Instead
They’re:
Ending retainers and switching to outcome-based growth partners
Keeping lean teams and plugging into full-service ecosystems like Fifth Shelf
Letting experts run ads, content, logistics—while they focus on the product
Compare DWP vs CSP →
Learn more about how our DWP model works
Ready to grow? Contact us